Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS
Watch WHO Treaty by Executive Agreement – Rumble, Brighteon and YouTube
Administratively Biden’s WHO treaty amendment recommendations are valid. People are shocked by this and I am stymied as to why it is popping up now when this was an active issue back last May. Organizations often function on emotionalism. I often wonder if that is not a fund raising ploy. Our Sovereignty became minimized since Harry Truman. I’ll get to that later in the program and references below.
With that, the O’Biden administration submitted amendments have validity based on at least two pillars. First off, what O’Biden is doing is not a new treaty but amending the existing UN Treaty, Chapter IX. Health, which established the WHO and delineated its already over-reaching authority. Second, the new language is such that all UN member states will accept these changes with an ‘out’ the statement: “The State Party shall accept or reject such” of the various amendment points where the statement is used, which is a bunch of times. Here is the actual recommended WHO Constitution amended document.
I know, these changes in the WHO constitution are frightful, outrageous and unsettling. But so are many of the more than 500 pages of Treaties and Executive Agreements In Force.
For the most part, US Citizens have no concept of Treaties and International Executive Agreements, known as Executive Agreements that have been and are affecting our Constitutional Republic for over 100 years. On this program I take you through the titles of just Afghanistan’s treaties and agreements with US. I have not seen anything in the State Department or Federal Register that negates/dissolves these treaties and agreements. Therefore, regarding Afghanistan, in the principles of International Law, we are on the hook to honor them… Ugg.
A little play on words. Who knew about all these Executive Agreements? You do not get educated about this topic in school nor from commentating educators like Tucker Carlson as well as all, and I do mean ALL, of the so called Patriot media who never educate the Citizenry about this loss of sovereignty and this authority from the slavery of many Executive Agreements. Oh, there is one exception to the my statement. Glenn Beck, while doing his educational programing a decade or so ago did bring this to light but not with the full force of the Liberty Destruction that Executive Agreements are causing.
Yes, We all bemoan that the whole educational system is void of serving the Citizen with insights on governance with least of all being Treaties and Executive Agreements. So stand by while I take you into my studies, a whole chapter of which I dedicated to Executive Agreements in my book. Yes, you can buy the book. Just contact me.
The Punch At The End
Most people in the US don’t care about this topic. They prefer the demonic ‘Superbowl Half-time show’ or some Hollywood self-aggrandizement event. Well, toward the end of this program, I give a punch in the arm. The answer to these issues is simple yet the way to get there complex. I will always give the direct solution – personal and national repentance.
Sam Adams Wisdom
Deferring to George Washington’s Farewell Address.
This first paragraph is often left out when references are made to the ‘Foreign entanglement’ paragraphs. My emphasis added.
‘Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it – It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?
In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.’
Thank you to all who are subscribers to the program. Please share the newsletter and subscribe to the Rumble or YouTube channel.
1. Comments on US sovereignty and health care are correct if you have read and understand the Amendments: Fact check: False claim about Biden, WHO and U.S. sovereignty – USA Today
2. Shall the Executive Agreement Replace the Treaty? by Edwin Borchard
3. Treaties And Executive Agreements-A Reply by Edwin Borchard
4. Biden was on this 2001 Senate Committee “Treaties and Other International Agreements The Role Of The United States Senate?” A Study, Prepared For The Committee On Foreign Relations, United States Senate, By The Congressional Research Service, Library Of Congress
5. As I note, there is language that requires the memeber Nations to choose if they will participate at the time of an emergency. #StopTheWHO: How You Can Take a Stand Against International Health Regulation Amendments
6.1977: Separation of Powers and International Executive Agreements by Arthur W. Rovine, United States Department of State
7. Great History of The Bricker Amendment – Wikipedia
8. Council on Foreign Relations: TWE Remembers: The Bricker Amendment – by James M. Lindsay, February 26, 2022
9. BRICKER AMENDMENT COLLECTION, 1952-1956 – Herbert Hoover Presidential Library
10. Globalism and Sovereignty: A Short History of the Bricker Amendment, Supranational Commissions Seek Veto Power Over American Policy – by Thomas E. Woods Jr. Monday, April 1, 1996
11. U.S. State Department: Treaties In Force – List of all treaties and Executive Agreements
12. The Use (and Abuse) of Executive Agreements, Session 2 of the Congressional Study Group – Brookings Institute 2020
13. International Agreements Without Senate Approval – JUSTIA US Law