Administratively Biden’s WHO treaty amendment recommendations are valid. People are shocked by this and I am stymied as to why it is popping up now when this was an active issue back last May. Organizations often function on emotionalism. I often wonder if that is not a fund raising ploy. Our Sovereignty became minimized since Harry Truman. I’ll get to that later in the program and references below.
With that, the O’Biden administration submitted amendments have validity based on at least two pillars. First off, what O’Biden is doing is not a new treaty but amending the existing UN Treaty, Chapter IX. Health, which established the WHO and delineated its already over-reaching authority. Second, the new language is such that all UN member states will accept these changes with an ‘out’ the statement: “The State Party shall accept or reject such” of the various amendment points where the statement is used, which is a bunch of times. Here is the actual recommended WHO Constitution amended document.
For the most part, US Citizens have no concept of Treaties and International Executive Agreements, known as Executive Agreements that have been and are affecting our Constitutional Republic for over 100 years. On this program I take you through the titles of just Afghanistan’s treaties and agreements with US. I have not seen anything in the State Department or Federal Register that negates/dissolves these treaties and agreements. Therefore, regarding Afghanistan, in the principles of International Law, we are on the hook to honor them… Ugg.
First of all, We hear the crowds at various Rallies chanting ‘Build That Wall!!’ While Congress is slow to act in violation of Article IV. Sec. 4 Clause 2, which guarantees against invasion. Allowing for the incursion of illegals, terrorists, drugs, human trafficking and gangs, often planned and incited by counter Constitutional entities, Therefore this is an invasion. Maybe the crowds should be chanting: Fund The Wall! What does it take to get the bureaucracy to function correctly? First of all consider a solution you can engage in.
Today we have a conversation with Quentin Kramer, the Managing Director of Fund The Wall. We will discuss how Citizens like you can cetainly take direct action in ensuring that our National and State(s) security and sovereignty is protected. Quentin gives us complete insight as to how Fund the Wall was started and what we can do to foster our National Security and Sovereignty.
With that said: The mirrors of history come to reflective reality here on Samuel Adams Returns.
For the reason that so many do not understand how Congress should function; IT IS Time to contact me so I can bring the seminar “From Covenant To The Present Constitution” to your community group, church, VFW or Patriot Group! We are developing our fall and spring calendar. Send me an email at: email@example.com
Well, this week has been full of interesting activities. The campaigns are coming on strong and the speeches by Trump are staying on message as well as getting more definitive. The Commander-n-Chief Forum was very interesting. You have to check it out on YouTube for yourself. Yesterday, we who understand our Foundational Intent, Constitutionalism and True Christianity now are in the new “basket of deplorables.” I wear the badge proudly!
Well, I searched through over 500 documents to come up with this quick analysis. The bottom line is that in every fundamental of the 10 Points on Immigration, they totally align with Founders Original Intent. Read the complete analysis Here!
Since our media and educational environment have broken with Founders Intent for well informed, moral and virtuous citizens, I begin today by defining Citizenship and the essence of “Popular Sovereignty.” I have to take us through this conceptually so that we could be more fully prepared to discuss the potential problems of aliens in the US, especially illegal aliens. In my research I was delighted to find almost exact language that is in this conversation in our present history. Even with the more liberally minded Theophilus Parsons having a more open immigration theory, he had a clear commentary regarding immigration and troublesome aliens.
I discuss the difference between a Citizen and a subject. The majorities of those flooding into this nation are subjects and have no concept of what it means to be a true citizen!
Bottom Line for now is that those that want an understanding of Constitutional Citizenship and aliens in reference to Trumps 10 point immigration plan should listen in today. – The Founders wanted us to gain knowledge and get involved! Being a Citizen is an Active involvement in our political life! Let’s get our feet on the street for this time is critical. Continue reading →
Comments Off on 9-10-16 10 Point Immigration Plan Aligns with Original Intent