Samuel Adams Returns – The Anti-federalists Got It Right: “Keep your enemies in the wrong” – from S. Adams to Alinsky through CPUSA to the Democrats
Make sure you read the comments about Sobolev further down.
People keep talking all around with words that they, the progressive-left, redefine or the mix bag of so called conservatives mimic. All the jaw flapping from the progressive-left is finger pointing with strong accusation of wrongdoing. The reality is: that they are the “anti-Constitutional globalist” ilk. And before the false flag redirection strategy used in the 1950’s we would be calling them what they are – communists or ‘communist dupes’.
So today I discuss how the phrase that Sam Adams wrote in 1775 becomes part of the Alinsky Hegelian Dialectic and is instituted by the Communist Party USA through the infiltration of the demoncrat party of the present. I discuss the violence of these progressive groups authenticity in the writing of Sobolev.
Lastly, I ask “why has the Christian been emasculated (the original definition of the word)?” Why won’t true Constitutionalist develop leaders to be policy makers in governance instead of chasing the dollar and being maneuvered to their own demise?
With that – The Founders wanted us to gain knowledge and get involved! Being a Citizen is an Active involvement in our political life! Let’s get our feet on the street for this time is critical!
Join me on today’s program to value the Founders perspective of the mirrors of history and the reality of the present.
And because you keep asking!
References: Radio Program Archives
For today’s program:
- Some Forms of Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, A. Sobolev (Delhi, 1956)
- Life and Public Service of Samuel Adams Vol. 2, Pgs. 267 & 268
- None Dare Call It Treason – 25 Years Later, John Stormer, Pgs. 491 – 493: I am including pgs. 492 & 493 here:
Sobolev: “Published in the 1974 February issue of World Marxist Review it said:
The aggregate experience of the world proletariat helps to specify certain conditions and prerequisites for the peaceful revolutionary process in various countries.
While emphasizing the “peaceful revolutionary process” Sobolev added the caution that communists do not rule out the use of violence when needed to bring about the transition to socialism. He said:
The experience of the international proletariat class struggle suggest that to recognize the possibility of peaceful transitions from capitalism to socialism does not mean making an absolute of it, let alone rejecting all social-political violence.
After keeping the door open to the use of violence, Sobolev’s ten-page article outlined the prerequisites for successfully organizing a peaceful transition to socialism. He summarized the blueprint saying:
First of all, the decisive prerequisite for a peaceful transition to socialism are (1) a state wide political crisis, (2) a unity of the working class movement, (3) a solid alliance of the working class with all working people, (4) the winning of middle strata of town and country for the cause of freedom and socialism, (5) the adoption of effective measures to neutralize wavering social strata.
Secondly, the working class and its allies must have a mass political organization capable of taking and holding power in both the provinces and the capital, no matter what turn developments may take.
Thirdly, to hold and extend their gains, the revolutionary action must be strong enough politically to defeat every attempt at armed violence against the people by countering it with revolutionary violence.
Fourthly, in the struggle, there is a limit to constitutional opportunities. At a certain stage, the Party has to fight for a change in the constitution itself…reorganization of the old machinery of state to uphold the people’s interests is imperative.
Sobolev’s outline appears to be a general blueprint. However, it becomes extremely comprehensive when the communist terminology used is interpreted and integrated with the Czech experience and present day conditions in America.”
- Because this is the solution we need to mentor out future leadership and policy makers: SACPS:
Presentations: What will Samuel Adams Center for Political Science (SACPS) do? Watch the presentation link.
- 3. Yes, And even more important as you look at what happened in the Republican held House: At the Samuel Adams Returns web site: “Not All Conservatives Are Constitutionalists” Or on Amazon: Paperback or the eBook