Episode 439:Covenanted Of and With Hell

See the link for the video of ‘Covenanted Of and With Hell’ at Rumble or YouTube

We have tens of millions who are employed by the Federal and States governments that have made a Covenant Of and With Hell.

How can I make such a sharp and accusatory statement? The law for all federalOath breaker employees requires an ‘oath’ according to 5 U.S. Code § 3331 – Oath of office. Not only that, every State has similar requirements for any government job or appointments. This is fact that individuals are calling upon their ‘god’ to affirm their ethical commitment to the execution of their duties.

You are whining, ‘Come on Tom, that is ridiculous about what an oath is or means. It is all just words.’ My retort: ‘Is it? Is an oath not a covenantal action?’

Here is 5 U.S. Code § 3331 – Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

Webster’s 1828 dictionary defines an oath as:

A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed. The appeal to God in an oath implies that the person imprecates1 his vengeance and renounces his favor if the declaration is false, or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury.

Who of you that have government employment or appointments of any nature understand the context of the oath you took as defined by Webster’s dictionary? Better yet, who is the god that you declared your oath to? To what god do you execute your duty with the full intent of fulfilling your oath?

As I’ve discussed in last months programing, all forms of governance, at every level, are based on religion. That of your personal religion but more so, that of the entity that you are governing within. Governance is a moral exercise of the belief system one is associated with.

In all cases, an oath is Covenantal. Therefore, those who adhere to their role in any public employment position, who have taken an oath in accepting that position, have in our modern systems Covenanted Of and With Hell.

More Than Opening Comments

When it comes to governance, a Constitution is Covenantal. Just a snippet on this from my book:

Covenant for our Founders had that critical perspective of how government worked, as covenant is the outline from God’s perspective for good governance beginning with self-governance.

What about covenant in general and its significance in any relationship whether it is God with man or mankind with mankind? Historically, Meredith Kline researched and noted that covenants go back to the ancient pagan world’s where special documents that are known as the suzerain (king-vassal) treaties exist. He further describes covenant like this:

“First, however, notice must be taken of a feature which law and promise covenants have in common but which, nevertheless, being more closely analyzed, serves to distinguish clearly between the two. Every divine-human covenant in Scripture involves a sanction-sealed commitment to maintain a particular relationship or follow a stipulated course of action. In general then a covenant may be defined as a relationship under sanctions.20 The covenantal commitment is characteristically expressed by an oath sworn in the solemnities of covenant ratification. Both in the Bible and in extra-biblical documents concerned with covenant arrangements the swearing of the oath is frequently found in parallelistic explication of the idea of entering into the treaty relationship, or as a synonym for it.

“The ratificatory oath was taken by both parties in parity covenants, but in other covenants the sworn commitment was ordinarily unilateral. It is this swearing of the ratificatory oath that provides and identification mark by which we can readily distinguish in the divine covenants of Scripture between a law covenant and one of promise. For it is evident that if God swears the oath of the ratification ceremony, that particular covenantal transaction is one of promise, whereas if man is summoned to swear the oath, the particular covenant thus ratified is one of law. In view of questions that have emerged in the course the development of Covenant Theology, it is especially to be observed that precisely because it is sworn commitment that constitutes these particular transactions “covenants”, a relationship ratified by a human oath of allegiance is a “covenant” because of the human oath, and it s a “covenant”, therefore, quite irrespective of whether or not the arrangement happens to be at the same time an administration of divine grace and promise.”21

The history of the effects of covenant thinking and relationship between Protestant Christendom, the state and the Liberty of the people goes back to those Scott Covenanters and their principle ideas that God is the ultimate ruler and that society derives its patterns for all aspects of life from the Biblical principles of governance, economy and individual relational liberty in the Kingship of Jesus Christ. This was established in two primary national documents of the 17th Century: “The National Covenant” in 1638 and the “Solemn League and Covenant” in 1643. The interesting result was a commitment of the political leaders, church leaders and through them, the People, to these covenants representing a form of republicanism that permeates the Tanakh, the Christian Bible Old Testament.

Final Point…For Now

As I clearly point out in the program itself, based on who your god is, it that god is anything other than the Reformation Biblical Yahweh, you have Covenanted Of and With Hell.

I do not agree with the full conclusion of the writer in Reference #7 but, he has it correct in that one is never relieved of there Oath in respect to any form of government / governance service.

Lastly, as we see all the jihadist uprisings across the nation, it is now extremely clear that these can never adhere to the Oath of Office since they are against the God of the Bible which made the U. S. Constitution Covenental.

Sam Adams Wisdom

From the Anti-federalists to which we have in our present day. Again, perfectly predicted. This is not an April fools joke: “A FARMER AND PLANTER” had his work printed in The Maryland Journal, and Baltimore Advertiser, April 1, 1788. (My emphasis added in bold and or italics.)

… And if they neglect calling in an excise officer at the time of making these things, they are liable to grievous fines and forfeitures, besides a long train of evils and inconveniences attending this detestable excise—to enumerate particularly would fill a volume. The excise officers have power to enter your houses at all times, by night or day, and if you refuse them entrance, they can, under pretense of searching for exciseable goods, that the duty has not been paid on, break open your doors, chests, trunks, desks, boxes, and rummage your houses from bottom to top. Nay, they often search the clothes, petticoats and pockets of ladies or gentlemen (particularly when they are coming from on board an East-India ship), and if they find any the least article that you cannot prove the duty to be paid on, seize it and carry it away with them; who are the very scum and refuse of mankind, who value not their oaths, and will break them for a shilling. This is their true character in England, and I speak from experience, for I have had the opportunity of putting their virtue to the test, and saw two of them break their oath for one guinea, and a third for one shilling’s worth of punch. What do you think of a law to let loose such a set of vile officers among you! Do you expect the Congress excise-officers will be any betterif God, in his anger, should think it proper to punish us for our ignorance, and sins of ingratitude to him, after carrying us through the late war, and giving us liberty, and now so tamely to give it up by adopting this aristocratical government?

From the Life and Public Service of Samuel Adams Volume II. 1777

Yes, we would disarm our internal enemies. Unfortunately, the O’biden leftist judges want to allow illegals to own firearms. We have a plethora of domestic enemies.

Powerful Psalm Prayers for Protection Against An Enemy: Psalm 18, Psalm 35, Psalm 54, Psalm 59, Psalm 64, Psalm 91, Psalm 109

As chairman of a committee for that purpose, Samuel Adams reported a plan for the suppression of the Tories in Somerset and Worcester Counties in Maryland, who had lately risen in arms against the Continental authorities. A protest against their proceedings having reached Congress, it was resolved to send sufficient force against them, with directions to seize and secure the leaders of the Tory faction, and to disarm all who refused to take the oath of allegiance. Two months later, the Maryland delegates represented the danger of an insurrection in these counties, and Congress appointed a committee, of which Adams was one, to meet the threatened danger. A plan was reported for the removal of desperate characters from the State, and for disarming all persons hostile to the American cause. The appointment of commissioners was recommended, with such powers as would enable them to detect and defeat plots and conspiracies against the liberties of America;

Page 190 – July 1774

6. Whether all the bugbears started against the Worcester covenant, as holding up the taking a solemn oath to ‘withdraw all commercial connections,’ which our honest commentators tell the people means even to deny buying or selling greens or potatoes to them, does not betray a great want of that candor and manly generosity which is expected from well-bred and reasonable citizens ? 7. Whether the suggestion that the Boston merchants ceasing to import will throw the trade into the hands of importers in other Provinces is not utterly unbecoming an inhabitant of that town into which the beneficence of the whole continent is ready to flow in the most exemplary manner?

Thank you to all who are subscribers to the program. Please share the newsletter and subscribe to the Rumble or YouTube channel.

References:

1. From Covenant To The Present Constitution Workbook by Thomas Niewulis Mar 19, 2018

2. Heartland Institute Poll Shows Nearly Three in 10 Voters Would Vote Illegally in 2024 Presidential Election By Jack McPherrin, Christopher Talgo, Justin Haskins, Donald Kendal Published April 16, 2024

3. How many people work for the federal government?

4. May 2023 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates by ownership – Federal, State, and Local Government, including State and Local Government Schools and Hospitals and the U.S. Postal Service (OEWS Designation)

5. U.S. Dept. of Energy – Employee Forms/Oath of Office

6. 5 U.S. Code § 3331 – Oath of office

7. Letter: Federal workers swear oath to constitution – Whidbey News-Times January 27, 2024

8. From Webster 1826 Dictionary

This Weeks News Articles Resources

1. Definition of Oath other than Webster’s 1826 Dictionary

2. A whopping 85 percent of New Yorkers said the cost of food is rising faster than their income in a poll released Tuesday.

3. Washington Post Editors: Rebuild Middle America with Mass Immigration

4. Tennessee House in Chaos After Passing Bill Allowing Teachers to Carry Guns

1To invoke, as an evil on any one; to pray that a curse or calamity may fall on one’s self or on another person.

Interested in Historical Truth?

Sign up to receive awesome content, every week.

Comments Off on Episode 439:Covenanted Of and With Hell

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Comments are closed.