Category Archives: Radio Program Archives

The audio archives for “Samuel Adams Returns – The Anti-federalists Got It Right!”

by | March 30, 2025 · 6:48 pm

Episode 448 – March Madness, Courts Gone Wild Against Article II

Those enamored with sports are looking at March Madness in respect to college basketball. Yet I take view a different sport and say March Madness, I told you so. For about a decade, I told those who would listen that the Anti-federalists predicted the judiciary would go out of their minds with power.

My contention with all the messaging regarding the war against the Republic remains the same:

  1. An ignorant, ambivalent, conflicted and uneducated Citizenry whose capacity for acting in Foundational moral and Constitutional truth is a wisp of a vapor in their imaginations of what was.

  2. A complete lack of knowledge regarding the foundational hierarchy of sovereignty, thereby living in the confusion of who and what is citizenship as well as allowing complacency in governance by despots hidden as judges, corporatists, politicians and bureaucrats.

  3. The media, talking heads, learned institutional pontificators (subject matter experts), and politicians who are promotors of psychological propaganda and not historical factual truth.

  4. Lawfare is the culmination of points 1 through 3 with increased ideological cunningness of those who not just despise our Constitutional Republic, federalism, foundational American economic systems and Christianity, but they actually hate them.

The construct of this program is focussed on the Article II powers of the President.

There is so much to take in from all the media programming babble that sorting truth and functionality is a great effort. Oh, that the average Citizen were once again able to be accused by the likes of General Gates as ‘being smatters of the law.’ This was referenced to the Colonist knowing the works of Sir William Blackstone better than the politicians in England.

So too we should be students of our history and government so that we can be ‘ever vigilant’ of our Liberties.

I hope you take the time to watch the program and consider the references.

This program is found at these links at Rumble or YouTube.

Tom

References:

Episode 354: Courts and Mental Health Industry Destroying the Republic

1. REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

1.a. What is an American Inn of Court?

1.b. American Inns of Court (AIC), Wikipedia

1.c. Inns of Court, British legal association

2. The Founders Constitution

3. Article 2, Section 2, Clauses 2 and 3

4. Brutus XI, XII, and XIII

5. William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States 34–35, 147–50, 171–73 1829 (2d ed.)

 

Article to check out

1. The Irony Of Justice Roberts And The Reality Of Rule 36 Affirmances, PAUL MORINVILLE – MARCH 30, 2025

2. REPORT: One-Third of D.C. District Judges Were Not Born in the United States and Had No Prior Judicial Experience When Appointed, By Mike LaChance Mar. 25, 2025

3. Trump DOJ Files Motion to Disqualify Obama Judge Beryl Howell From Perkins Coie Case

4. Rep. Chip Roy Urges Congress to Defund Radical Courts as Senate Impeachment Requires 14 Democrat Votes

5. WAYNE ROOT: Back in 2015, I Wrote, “Is Supreme Court Justice John Roberts Being Blackmailed?” This Question is as Valid Today as a Decade Ago.

6. Here’s the Organization Chart That Exposes How Unelected Activist Judges Are Undermining the Role of Each Branch of Government

 

Comments Off on Episode 448 – March Madness, Courts Gone Wild Against Article II

Filed under podcast, Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , ,

by | September 26, 2024 · 9:51 pm

Episode 447 – Immigration Confusion with Springfield, Ohio An Example

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Immigration Confusion with Springfield, Ohio An Example’ at Rumble or YouTube

From a Foundational First Principles perspective we are living out Immigration Confusion with Springfield, Ohio as one example. You must be patient and get through the confusion described at the Immigration Confusiononset of this program before I take you into the First Principles of Constitutional intent regarding naturalization, immigration and Citizenship. It may shock you to know that the Founders believed in open immigration. They did not expect mass migration as a form of immigration. I will clearly clarify what was expected of all new persons coming to these United States in search of Citizenship.

As always, I will make some comments on the recorded program that are not written. I have a hard time stay on script.

A Historical Diversion

John Adams wrote in Novanglus, Thoughts on Government, Defence of the Constitution, emphasis is my addition:

“The patricians were alarmed; but Cassius had numbers on his side, and was so confident of success, that he betrayed too soon his ambitious design, by offering the freedom of the city to aliens, who, at his invitation, crowded from all parts to vote in the assemblies of the Roman people. This convinced all parties that his views were, by the means of aliens and indigent citizens, to usurp the government. All parties combined against him, and he was condemned for treason. The tribunes had no sooner destroyed Cassius, than they adopted his project, and insisted on the law for the nomination of three commissioners.”

The same strategies used within the Uni-party, oligarchs and corporatists of our present systems.

From Samuel Adam: TO THE LEGISLATURE OF MASSACHUSETTS. JANUARY 16, 1795.

Elections are the immediate acts of the people’s sovereignty, in which no foreigners should be allowed to intermeddle. Upon free and unbiassed elections, the purity of the government, and consequently the safety and welfare of the citizens, may I not say altogether depend.

Again, TO THE LEGISLATURE OF MASSACHUSETTS. JANUARY 27, 1797.

That elections may not be contaminated by strangers, or unqualified persons, may it not be necessary that every man may be known, as far as possible, when he presents himself to give his vote; this may be more especially important in our seaports and other populous towns, in which many foreigners of all sorts frequently reside. I would be far from dictating to you, but I would submit to your judgment whether, considering the liberality of this country to foreigners, and the frequency of their naturalizations, it may not be eligible that such foreigners should be required when they offer their votes to the Selectmen of the towns, to produce authentic certificates from the Courts, by which they were endowed with so high a privilege, as a test of their citizenship.

This is meant for local, state and national elections. Voter Identity is necessary and simply, No foreigners can vote.

Continuing

The difference between the perspective on immigration from our foundation and the present is in that: at the founding there were not any public services or tax payer buckets of money for aliens coming to the United States. In other words, No hand outs and No bureaucracies manipulating the system. Also, the issue of allegiance was crucial.

I will be delving into those First Principles of the Constitutional structure for immigration/Naturalization as developed in Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 (Citizenship). In Addition to the University of Chicago Press ‘the Founders Constitution,’ I will be directing your attention to a great article from Hillsdale College on this topic (see the References). The subheading in that article on Assimilation is well done and documented.

As one can ascertain, what is going on in our present time is a complete confusion of Constitutional intent vs. political rhetoric and the unlearned truth for those desiring to keep the United States as they believe it should be.

But what if the confusion is in the lack of knowledge of original intent and then the ideological globalist and corporatist perversion of Constitutional intent?

Springfield, Ohio as One Example

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 447 – Immigration Confusion with Springfield, Ohio An Example

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , ,

by | August 28, 2024 · 6:17 pm

Episode 446: The Black Cloak Brigade

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘The Black Cloak Brigade’ at Rumble or YouTube. Also, Rev. John Webb sermon (pdf) ‘The Government of Christ (1738)’ at Belcher Foundation. My humble delivery Rev. Webb’s 1738 Sermon.

black cloak brigadeThe third week of August in Chicago 2024 was the predictable collection of the Demonic Nocturnal Congregation (DNC) in fulfillment of that which was established through decades of gaslighting by the Black Cloak Brigade spawned prodigy1(must read footnote definition). This gathering is the expected result of 200 years of Unitarianism, Universalism and the Social Gospel. In short, the pinnacle of perfected humanism. The resulting assemblage inside mesmerized by the gaslighting (more on gaslighting further in) high priests and priestesses, while outside, the co-optate2 throngs of gargoyles spout the vitriol venom of invasive radicals and indoctrinated subversives.

Massive Influence

It is critical to understand that the massive influence of the present day Black Cloak Brigade is very much as that of the pastors in the founding era. Take this quote from The Life of Samuel Adams,

‘… so at the top of society were the ministers, men often of fine force, ability, and education. No other such career as the ministry afforded was open in those days to ambitious men. Year by year the best men of each Cambridge class went into the ministry, and the best of them were sifted out for the Boston pulpit. Jonathan May- hew, Andrew Eliot, Samuel Cooper, Charles Chauncey, Mather Byles, —all were characters of mark, true to the Puritan standards, generally, as regards faith, eloquent in their office, friends and advisers of the political leaders, themselves often political leaders, foremost in the public meetings, and active in private.

Together with the ministers, the merchants were a class of influence.’

One has to have a knowledge of what a real Puritan meant in the founding era. Especially as to root theology for developing personal and economic Liberty. The Sermon I include with this program is full of Puritan / Calvinistic theology that establishes how those elected or appointed are to govern, as servants of the King of all creation.

Unlike the Black Regiment (Black Robe Regiment), The Black Cloak Brigade is more than the Tory (British sympathizer) ideology and theology of the loyalist Colonial era. The emphasis of The Black Cloak Brigade is best found through the second definition for a cloke (cloak) in Webster’s 1828 Dictionary – Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 446: The Black Cloak Brigade

Filed under Political Theology, Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | July 26, 2024 · 8:36 am

Episode 445: The Assassination of the Declaration, the Constitution, The Citizenry and Truth. Sam Adams Speech 8/1/1776

See the link for the video of ‘The Assassination of the Declaration, the Constitution, The Citizenry and Truth’ at Rumble or YouTube

Assassination of DeclarationWhat we have witnessed in the month of July is further completion by the Tory Loyalist of The Assassination of the Declaration, the Constitution, The Citizenry and Truth. In the third segment you will be introduced to Sam Adams speech on 8/1/1776 regarding the Declaration of Independence.

In reviewing all of those who in our modern times are called ‘leftist,’ ‘communists,’ ‘globalists,’ and so on, the reality is that these people and groups of people are the posterity of the former Colonial Tory Loyalists. I detail this during the actual program. The rhetoric of the modern Tory Loyalists is the same as those of pre-revolution times regarding the Liberty seeking citizenry and their meetings:

Wrote a Tory in those days ” The town-meeting at Boston is the hot-bed of sedition. It is there that all their dangerous insurrections are engendered; it is there that the flame of discord and rebellion was first lighted up and disseminated over the provinces; it is therefore greatly to be wished that Parliament may rescue the loyal inhabitants of that town and province from the merciless hand of an ignorant mob, led on and inflamed by self-interested and profligate men.1

To set the tone of my initial argument, let me refer you first to a quote from Ephesians Chapter 2: 1-3

1And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins, 2 in which you once walked according to the [a]course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience, 3 among whom also we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others.

This takes me to the point regarding assassination as a noble effort.

Assassination: the Highest Authoritative Direction of Dehumanization

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 445: The Assassination of the Declaration, the Constitution, The Citizenry and Truth. Sam Adams Speech 8/1/1776

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | July 3, 2024 · 6:02 pm

Episode 444: Dead Constitution By Dead Virtue, Morals, and Religion

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Dead Constitution By Dead Virtue, Morals, and Religion’ at Rumble or YouTube

Yes, ours is a Dead Constitution. How so? We have a dead Constitution by dead virtue, morals and religion. In his letter to the Massachusetts Militia, dated 11 October 1798, John Adams ended this communication with more than just the common phrase most improperly assuming that Adams is claiming a Christian constitution.

Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, and Revenge or Galantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

To this concept of who the Constitution is functional for, Madison wrote:

To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.

Following that, Jefferson wrote:

No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.

Patric Henry rounds this out with:

A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.

Oh, you want to hear from Sam Adams on this theme:

Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.

Why is that important to note?

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 444: Dead Constitution By Dead Virtue, Morals, and Religion

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , ,

by | June 7, 2024 · 8:15 am

Things A Changing and Things to Come

It is important for you to know that Samuel Adams Returns has Things A Changing and Things toChange Come.

What is changing?

First is that I will not be doing weekly programs. Second, Samuel Adams will not be presenting in character except for Liberty Camp USA in Geauga and Lake Counties, Ohio. Third, program content on the website will not only be on YouTube and Rumble but also at Substack.

These seem like simple changes but they are significant when considering my time and financial resources.

Which brings me to ‘Why the Changes?’

Keeping it simple.

First, I have mentioned on a few recent programs that it takes me twenty to thirty plus hours a week to prepare, video, post productions, write the blog post with references and get the news letter out. I just do not have that time any longer. Continue reading →

Comments Off on Things A Changing and Things to Come

Filed under podcast, Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , ,

by | May 24, 2024 · 7:10 am

Episode 443: Snarky Sam Adams

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Snarky Sam Adams’ at Rumble or YouTube

Snarky Sam Adams was a master of language. Sam could be sharply critical by cutting deep into the psyche of his enemies with truth. During the 1700’s, sharp language was used in satire as well as directly attacking a person, all respectfully of course. This is important as I want to talk about hope to those who were taken aback with my program last week.snarky Sam Adams

The hope is in that I wanted you to think with a solid footing as well as through a difficult alternative perspective as to why we are seeing evil predominate at all levels of government, which includes the family and church. I want to challenge your evangelical presuppositions in politics, family, church as well as work/business which is warped by unitarianism and evangelicalism that has succumbed to pansy-ism, I mean polytheistic pandering to pluralism/humanism.

I have proven this pluralistic polytheism in discussing the false concept of Congress being Christian in the several programs where I covered the topic last month, here and here.

When, last week, I introduced you to the facts that many of those called Founders were unitarians, I must remind you that Sam Adams was a strong trinitarian, Reformed Calvinist. So much so that he lived his Calvinism in a true covenantal manner regarding family, work and his activities in the political sphere. To which then he received the moniker ‘The Last Puritan.’ And the historical facts are that those who landed on American shores, especially in the northern colonies were Reformed Calvinist Christians.

This is quantified by Gary Scott Smith in his book ‘God and Politics: Four Views on the Reformation of Civil Government‘ by writing,

Reformed theology was carried to the shores of America by English Puritans in the 1620s. From the founding of Plymouth to the American Revolution, about 80 percent of the colonists were adherents of Reformed theology who belonged to various denominations: Presbyterian, Congregationalist, Baptist, Dutch Reformed, German Reformed, and other smaller Calvinistic Communions.

The major mischief that the vast majority modern, 19th and 20th century, denomination have caused is compromising with humanism. Better called the American Enlightenment. The entanglements of an Enlightenment world view opens personal and political polity to humanistic pluralism which was the repeated downfall of Israel. This is a most defining perspective by Gary North in Political Polytheism:

One reason why the Israelites failed to pursue a systematic program of world evangelism is because God’s program required covenantal faithfulness, manifested in public justice and personal dealings – relationships governed by God’s law and enforced covenantally: family, Church, and State. This program of world evangelism required the Israelites to obey God’s civil laws both at home and abroad. Their failure to obey at home led to their failure to bring the message of spiritual deliverance to the world. Instead, they were repeatedly delivered by God into the world, as foreign invaders captured the reigns of power inside the nation, or else captured the people and sent them into slavery abroad.

It is my contention that the failure of worldwide Christian evangelism today is to a large degree the result of a similar failure of God’s people to proclaim and pursue covenantal civil standards for their own societies. There are at least seven hundred different plans for converting the world to Christ now in operation.1 Not one of them seems to be working well enough to offer much hope that the whole world will be converted in time to save the souls of some five billion non-Christian people who are already alive.

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 443: Snarky Sam Adams

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , ,

by | May 17, 2024 · 7:54 am

Episode 442: Crushed My Presuppositions

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Crushed My Presuppositions – Shattered’ at Rumble or YouTube

This weeks program preparations crushed my presuppositions about the foundations of the Constitution. Have you ever had your presuppositions crushed – shattered? Did you ever, over time, think that ‘something is wrong in the State of Denmark?’ You know, you have had the inkling1 in the back of your mind, ‘there is more going on than what I’m seeing or reading on the surface of it all?’Conspiracy in Philadelphia

Make sure you check the References and This Weeks Articles

I know my critics will be all over me on this. Let me put it to you this way. The Constitution is the most unique form of covenantal government devised by men. It is the law of the land. With the original Ten Amendments it is the most functional system that should be able to maintain the liberties of those compacted to it. It should keep private property in the hands of legal citizens. I should function within its boundaries.

Yet, we see a completely different resultant in function and outcomes. Yes, the Anti-federalist argued that there would be national encroachments upon the States and therefore upon the individual Citizen of the States, right into your bathroom, bedroom, kitchen and even bathroom.

These functions and outcomes is what I am addressing. I am taking a new position that differentiates between human culture and a governing political2 state. To which this study crushed my presupposition of the Constitution having a Biblical Christian foundation.

What Is Said Is Not Meant By the Sayer

Ponder this quote as we then consider A question of Sovereignty.

As has been noted, many men use words which to others imply a religious view not held by the speaker or writer without an awareness either of the divergence of meaning or the mixed presuppositions. Witness, for example, Rev. John Witherspoon (1722–1794), Presbyterian leader who in 1768 assumed the presidency of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University). Witherspoon taught many who later played an active role in American life. His own belief in sound money, mixed government and a division of powers was pronounced. An orthodox Calvinist, Witherspoon, without any sense of contradiction, also followed the philosophy of Thomas Reid34 (1710–1796), Scottish realism, using this questionable tool against Hume, Deism and French philosophers. In his Lectures on Moral Philosophy, he spoke the language of rights and reason, combining with this man-centered emphasis his own theocentric faith.

R. J. Rushdoony (1964)

In my crushed presuppositions, I delve into the study of a question I often ask on the program: Who is the Sovereign? With that I will always point out that all and every form of government and governance is religious and theological. Which asks the next question: Which religion and theology? 

Remember that I did a program on Madison purposefully attacked Christian Biblical principles in government, especially covenantal government. (See Episode 393: Madison – The Original Anti-Christian Nationalist)

A Question of Sovereignty

As I often do, I have to begin with a question of sovereignty. Here, Sam Adams writes to Richard Henry Lee, I hope to direct you to more of this correspondence as time permits but you may have to look at Lee’s writing linked in the References. Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 442: Crushed My Presuppositions

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , ,

by | May 10, 2024 · 6:56 am

Episode 441: Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat’ at Rumble or YouTube

treachery in treatiesTreachery in Treaties is evidenced in reading through the State Departments ‘Treaties In Force.’ Just consider the ‘2021 – 2023 — SUPPLEMENT,’ which is made up of 86 pages of treaties and agreements either renewed or new. Not withstanding the 570 pages of the first document.

This week I don’t have the time to write a long posting so you are going to have to listen or watch the program to get the full content.

Why are the links in the intro paragraph important?

Because, they are the law of the land. You scream… WHAT? Obviously you do not understand the Federal Constitution and its effects fully enforced. Yes, Here you will see treachery in treaties being set up.

Article 6, Clause 2 – The Founders Constitution

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Now, the ‘Treaties In Force’ do not include all the United Nations (UN) treaties and agreements wrapped into one larger agreement, and there are other specific UN treaties we are subjects to. Yes, I use subjects as in Webster’s dictionary definition:

Noun: One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.

Verb: To bring under the power or dominion of.

Therefore, The shoe fits according to Article 6, Clause 2 … these treaties are ‘supreme law of the land’ and we are subject to them through ‘the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.’ I have much more to say on this on the podcast.

For that, the reference is Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3:§§ 1831–33, 1835–36

Do ponder on the use of ‘notwithstanding’ as used here and the Webster 1828 definition.

Anti-federalists response to Art. 6, Sec 2: Federal Farmer, no. 4

George Mason, Virginia Ratifying Convention

St. George Tucker, Blackstone’s Commentaries 1:App. 369–70

It may seem very extraordinary, that a people jealous of their liberty, and not insensible of the allurements of power, should have entrusted the federal government with such extensive authority as this article conveys: controlling not only the acts of their ordinary legislatures, but their very constitutions, also.

CONSPIRACY IN PHILADELPHIA

I came across a very interesting book written in 2004 by Dr. Gary North ‘Conspiracy In Philadelphia.’ He explains that: ‘This book is an update of Part 3 of Political Polytheism: The Myth of Neutrality (Tyler, Texas: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989).’ My purpose in bringing this to you is that I have been on the track of discussing ‘covenant’ in the last few programs. Both of these books are a deep dive into Covenantal relationship and governance with the former being specific to the U. S. Constitution. Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 441: Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , ,

by | May 2, 2024 · 8:31 pm

Episode 440: Faithful to Foolishness – 18 USC Ch. 115

See the link for the video of ‘Faithful to Foolishness – 18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES’ at Rumble or YouTube

We are five generations of the Faithful to Foolishness. Beginning with those born in 1928, know as the Silent Generation all the way to the Gen Z / iGen. We five generations are in deep want of wisdom and good judgment. We have fallen into absurdity and act in every form of folly known to mankind. (reference A Year-by-Year Guide to the Different Generations)

‘Harsh you say.’ I retort, Not at all. I will prove that we have fallen so far from Foundational teachings and the intent of liberty that we allow ‘lawfare’ to become a normality in politics, economics, culture and law itself.

In this spring time of 2024 we see that 18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES are selectively administered within the progressive / leftist, politicized legal system, against those who are Christians, patriots and people of common sense reasoning. How do I tie the generational faithfulness to foolishness with federal law? How is the majority of this statute even necessary when foreign entities are gifted with citizenship but never renounce their ideologies?

My intent for this program was to show more of how our governments (local, state and federal,) businesses and churches are in violation of 18 USC Ch. 115 but as often happens, the wind changes and one must tack accordingly to navigate these shifting winds and the tides of our times. As you know, I will adlib in the program as I work through the content in this newsletter. So please listen to the program and use the newsletter as reference material.

Adjusting for the Wind

I am making this last minute insert into the beginning of this program. Take full account that just this Wednesday, the Folly of the House of Representatives: ‘House GOP Passes Controversial Bill Labeling Certain Christian Scriptures as ‘Antisemitic,’ Sparking Fears of Criminalizing Religious Beliefs.’ I call it folly based on the Wester 1828 dictionary definition as:

1. Weakness of intellect; imbecility of mind. Want of understanding.

 A fool layeth open his folly Proverbs 13:16.

2. A weak or absurd act not highly criminal; an act which is inconsistent with the dictates of reason, or with the ordinary rules of prudence. In this sense it may be used in the singular, but is generally in the plural. Hence we speak of the follies of youth.

3. An absurd act which is highly sinful; any conduct contrary to the laws of God or man; sin; scandalous crimes; that which violates moral precepts and dishonors the offender. Shechem wrought folly in Israel. Achan wrought folly in Israel. Genesis 34:7. Joshua 7:15.

4. Criminal weakness; depravity of mind.

This ‘Antisemitic Act’ is once again reactionary legislation with gross unintended consequences lurking with 1st Amendment assaults on Pastors and Christianity in general. Once again, Speaker Johnson is showing he lives for the god of government and not his Christian claims. The legislation does nothing to deal with the underlying subversion, sedition or even treason being foisted on We The People by business subversive collusion with politicians, the subversive collusion of leftist in the press, the subversive collusion of politicians and bureaucrats with foreign agents who hate our Constitutional Republic. But we know that the guilty can never see their crimes and nothing will be changed.

Consider what a key President Kennedy advisor wrote regarding the implementation of Fabian socialism in the U. S. Taken from None Dare Call It Treason, 1964:

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., a Harvard professor and ADA-founder, was Kennedy’s special assistant. In 1947, Schlesinger wrote:

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 440: Faithful to Foolishness – 18 USC Ch. 115

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , ,