Tag Archives: treaties

by | May 10, 2024 · 6:56 am

Episode 441: Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

See the link for the video of ‘Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat’ at Rumble or YouTube

treachery in treatiesTreachery in Treaties is evidenced in reading through the State Departments ‘Treaties In Force.’ Just consider the ‘2021 – 2023 — SUPPLEMENT,’ which is made up of 86 pages of treaties and agreements either renewed or new. Not withstanding the 570 pages of the first document.

This week I don’t have the time to write a long posting so you are going to have to listen or watch the program to get the full content.

Why are the links in the intro paragraph important?

Because, they are the law of the land. You scream… WHAT? Obviously you do not understand the Federal Constitution and its effects fully enforced. Yes, Here you will see treachery in treaties being set up.

Article 6, Clause 2 – The Founders Constitution

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Now, the ‘Treaties In Force’ do not include all the United Nations (UN) treaties and agreements wrapped into one larger agreement, and there are other specific UN treaties we are subjects to. Yes, I use subjects as in Webster’s dictionary definition:

Noun: One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.

Verb: To bring under the power or dominion of.

Therefore, The shoe fits according to Article 6, Clause 2 … these treaties are ‘supreme law of the land’ and we are subject to them through ‘the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.’ I have much more to say on this on the podcast.

For that, the reference is Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3:§§ 1831–33, 1835–36

Do ponder on the use of ‘notwithstanding’ as used here and the Webster 1828 definition.

Anti-federalists response to Art. 6, Sec 2: Federal Farmer, no. 4

George Mason, Virginia Ratifying Convention

St. George Tucker, Blackstone’s Commentaries 1:App. 369–70

It may seem very extraordinary, that a people jealous of their liberty, and not insensible of the allurements of power, should have entrusted the federal government with such extensive authority as this article conveys: controlling not only the acts of their ordinary legislatures, but their very constitutions, also.

CONSPIRACY IN PHILADELPHIA

I came across a very interesting book written in 2004 by Dr. Gary North ‘Conspiracy In Philadelphia.’ He explains that: ‘This book is an update of Part 3 of Political Polytheism: The Myth of Neutrality (Tyler, Texas: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989).’ My purpose in bringing this to you is that I have been on the track of discussing ‘covenant’ in the last few programs. Both of these books are a deep dive into Covenantal relationship and governance with the former being specific to the U. S. Constitution. Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episode 441: Treachery in Treaties – Better To Liken To Jehoshaphat

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , ,

by | February 24, 2023 · 12:22 pm

Episoode 389: WHO Treaty by Executive Agreement

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

Watch WHO Treaty by Executive Agreement –  Rumble, Brighteon and YouTube 

Administratively Biden’s WHO treaty amendment recommendations areWHO Treaty valid. People are shocked by this and I am stymied as to why it is popping up now when this was an active issue back last May. Organizations often function on emotionalism. I often wonder if that is not a fund raising ploy. Our Sovereignty became minimized since Harry Truman. I’ll get to that later in the program and references below.

With that, the O’Biden administration submitted amendments have validity based on at least two pillars. First off, what O’Biden is doing is not a new treaty but amending the existing UN Treaty, Chapter IX. Health, which established the WHO and delineated its already over-reaching authority. Second, the new language is such that all UN member states will accept these changes with an ‘out’ the statement: “The State Party shall accept or reject such” of the various amendment points where the statement is used, which is a bunch of times. Here is the actual recommended WHO Constitution amended document.

I know, these changes in the WHO constitution are frightful, outrageous and unsettling. But so are many of the more than 500 pages of Treaties and Executive Agreements In Force.

For the most part, US Citizens have no concept of Treaties and International Executive Agreements, known as Executive Agreements that have been and are affecting our Constitutional Republic for over 100 years. On this program I take you through the titles of just Afghanistan’s treaties and agreements with US. I have not seen anything in the State Department or Federal Register that negates/dissolves these treaties and agreements. Therefore, regarding Afghanistan, in the principles of International Law, we are on the hook to honor them… Ugg.

WHO Knew?

Continue reading →

Comments Off on Episoode 389: WHO Treaty by Executive Agreement

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , ,

by | August 7, 2017 · 1:02 pm

8-5-17 Consolidated Government Not the Republic You Thought It Was

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

Consolidated Government Not the Republic You Thought It Was

Continuing to enhance the program on video and then putting the archive segments up on the SamuelAdamsReturns YouTube channel. Videos posted on Sunday.

In preparing for today’s program I was digging in on the Senate from the Anti-federalists perspective when I was surprised by what I’ve previously read. You know how something jumps out as if it is fresh and new. In the Founders Constitutions I was going through the topic of ‘Popular Basis for Government’ and a series of the Anti-federalists hit our present situation of despotic oligarchy right on the head. Simply, The Constitution as it is today and from the beginning is not the idea of a Republic that we think it is. Continue reading →

Comments Off on 8-5-17 Consolidated Government Not the Republic You Thought It Was

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , ,

by | July 2, 2017 · 10:13 pm

7-1-17 Article VI: From ‘Who Is Sovereign’ to Health Care Mandate

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

Article VI: From ‘Who Is Sovereign’ to Health Care Mandate

I want to pick up this week from last by furthering the discussion on Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution. First in this discussion must be the question: “Who is the sovereign and who is ultimate in universal sovereignty?” Then we turn to the Founders’ regarding intent of Article VI, Clause 2

With that the next questions is: “How do treaties apply to the law of the land?” I intend to take in the international agreement mandates for universal health care. How do these treaties and international agreement entanglements affect policy making if neither have been ratified or confirmed? Reference items #7 and #8 below get to the detail of this issue. Don’t Be Fooled in Item #5 about non-binding. That is misleading when you look at Item #6 **** note. Continue reading →

Comments Off on 7-1-17 Article VI: From ‘Who Is Sovereign’ to Health Care Mandate

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , ,

by | June 24, 2017 · 3:13 pm

6-24-17 Constitution Vs Constitutionalism

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

Constitution Vs

Constitutionalism

Many Conservatives and those in the Patriot movement keep calling on Congress to “Stand on the Constitution”, “Abide by the Constitution” or “Act according to the Constitutions”. Well, I’m here to tell you that – They Are!

This week I give you only the extreme tip of the iceberg from my Presentation/lecture on the ‘Tale of Two Constitutions” and focus on the Constitution Vs Constitutionalism. I again take you through the very tip of the effects of Article VI. So I want to take you through this – reality that the ‘framework’ that everyone is charging Congress to uphold should be influenced by implementation of Founders Intent – but what are the actual influential 20th & 21st Centuries thoughts on Constitutionalism? Do you know the difference? Continue reading →

Comments Off on 6-24-17 Constitution Vs Constitutionalism

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

by | June 12, 2017 · 2:38 pm

6-10-17 From Rio to Paris, Constitution that Was and Is

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

From Rio to Paris, Constitution that Was and Is

This week has seen the sad testimony of a self-admittedly “weak man”, Mr. Comey. One of the sickest commentaries I’ve heard from someone who is suppose to be the epitome of the justice department. I have fired employees for less but deception and excuses as what Comey represented would be grounds for immediately being walked out the door. But, that is not what this weeks program is about.

Not only was I updating my lecture presentation for the coming Tuesday at the Geauga County TEA Party meeting but I became engaged in a Facebook conversation on the Liberty Radio Networks FB page. This conversation was related to a post about exiting the Paris Accord and that we have not really exited it. Well, the answer is ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. I don’t get into the details of the exit but the larger conversation regarding the Constitutionality of the Accord in the first place. Continue reading →

Comments Off on 6-10-17 From Rio to Paris, Constitution that Was and Is

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , , ,

by | November 3, 2014 · 12:56 am

November 1, 2014 – Senate, Treaties and International Executive Agreements

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: iHeartRadio | RSS | More

On this broadcast of Samuel Adams Returns – The Anti-federalist Got It Right, ( www.lwrn.net ) I continue the discussion of how the Senate is now a part of democracy and not the Republic to which it was intended. Then I get into a real sore spot, Treaties and International Executive Agreements. De Tocqueville wrote that if tyranny would engross America, it would a ‘soft despotism” that arose through elected administrators. For over 100 years we have been electing administrators over statesmen, socialism entered into this nation since the early 1800’s and infiltrated the core principles of We the People so that most do not have the concept of what Foundational Liberty is about.

 

Hence we have had since the 1930’s International Executive Agreements at a ratio of almost 20:1 over treaties that have established that ‘soft despotism’ and stripped us of our individual and national sovereignty, making us serfs in the globalist dream.

All audios below are in radio programs segment order:
The Anti-federalist view of the Senate – Segment 1
The Anti-federalist view of the Senate – Segment 2
The Anti-federalist view of the Senate – Segment 3

Leave a Comment

Filed under Radio Program Archives

Tagged as , , , , , , , , , ,